summary ch 1 & 2
Chapter one of Un-Spun discusses how companies and politicians use facts or lack there of to distort information. It talks about Listerine and prescription companies using falsies in their advertising, they use them to confuse the consumer into purchasing their product over their competitor. The authors talked about pharmaceutical companies and how they can say that their products are prescription strength even if they are only half prescription strength. Also the authors mentioned that Listerine has in the past lied, they said that their product could cure halitosis, which is not true. Also Listerine has made the consumer believe that their product can permanently kill bacteria, when in fact the bacteria come back not long after use of the product.
Chapter two discussed many tactics that politicians use to bend the truth. The authors warn to beware of “the dangling comparative”, this is when a person uses words such as larger, better, faster. Also words to beware of are what the authors call " the superlatives swindle”, which are words like "more" and "higher". Both of these categories of words are not compared to anything in the politician’s speech, they are just simply used with out anything to prove their weight. A politician can say that taxes will be “higher”, without saying what they will be higher in comparison to.
I believe that these two chapters (especially the first one) will make me a more knowledgeable consumer. I would like to believe what companies tell me about their products is true, now I will take them with a grain of salt. I also find it interesting to see just how manipulative politicians are; it scares me how they bend the truth to attempt to make us believe what ever they tell us. The fear that they try and use is not new to me, it makes me sick that politicians and companies alike use these fear tactics to scare the American public into submission. If at first they don’t succeed scare and threaten of a nuclear attack.
- manuelfonseca's blog
- Login or register to post comments


more needed
Shawna is correct to suggest that there is not enough here, because there are quite a few of the major details missing. In the second chapter, each warning sign should be considered a major detail and if that's the chapter you end up doing a fuller summary of and a response to, you'll need to hit on all of them. The first chapter has a number of bold headings and each of those can be considered major details. If that's the chapter you more fully summarize and respond to, then you'll need to touch on each of those points. Bradley
Nice Summary
I think you did a good job overall. There were many major points in the two chapters. So maybe next time, instead of focusing on just one or two major points/examples, find a major point/example in each of the subsections.
Shawna B.
Thank you
After reading your comment, I see that I could have, and will next time focus in on more of the facts from the chapters.
both
You got both chapters in here, and you glazed over each chapter per paragraph nicely. You gave the reader a nice intro to why they may want to read the book and what it is about.
My only suggestion is perhaps you will need to pinpoint the details and examples in the essay.